Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) is an advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) designed to detect pedestrians in a vehicle’s path and automatically apply the brakes to avoid or mitigate collisions.
As a key component of Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Protection, pedestrian AEB is increasingly emphasized in vehicle safety standards and consumer safety rating programs like Euro NCAP and, more recently, the US NCAP.
It integrates sensors (e.g., cameras, radar, lidar) and software to identify pedestrians, assess collision risks, and initiate braking if the driver does not respond in time.
Below is a comprehensive explanation of pedestrian AEB, its functionality, testing in safety programs, relevant standards, integration with systems like Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS), and its role in reducing pedestrian injuries and fatalities.
What is Pedestrian AEB?
Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) is a safety technology that:
- Detects Pedestrians: Uses sensors to identify pedestrians (adults or children) in or near the vehicle’s path, such as crossing a road or walking alongside it.
- Assesses Risk: Calculates the likelihood of a collision based on pedestrian position, vehicle speed, and trajectory.
- Intervenes Automatically: Applies partial or full braking to avoid the collision or reduce impact speed if a crash is imminent.
- Alerts Drivers: Provides visual, audible, or haptic warnings to prompt driver action before automatic braking.
Pedestrian AEB is part of broader AEB systems, which may also address car-to-car collisions or cyclist detection, but it is specifically tailored to protect vulnerable road users (VRUs) who lack vehicle protection.
Purpose:
- Prevent pedestrian collisions in urban environments, where 40–50% of pedestrian fatalities occur at crosswalks or intersections.
- Reduce injury severity by lowering impact speeds, as even a 10 km/h reduction can significantly decrease fatality risk (e.g., 20% fatality risk at 40 km/h vs. 5% at 30 km/h, per WHO data).
How Pedestrian AEB Works
Pedestrian AEB systems combine hardware and software to achieve rapid detection and response:
1. Sensors:
- Cameras: Provide visual recognition of pedestrian shapes and movements, effective in daylight and increasingly at night with enhanced imaging.
- Radar: Detects objects’ distance and speed, reliable in adverse weather (e.g., rain, fog).
- Lidar: Offers precise 3D mapping of pedestrians, used in premium vehicles for high accuracy.
- Ultrasonic Sensors: Detect close-range objects, useful in low-speed scenarios (e.g., parking).
2. Processing:
- Algorithms analyze sensor data to distinguish pedestrians from other objects (e.g., signs, trees) using machine learning and pattern recognition.
- Calculates time-to-collision (TTC) based on vehicle speed, pedestrian trajectory, and distance.
3. Response:
- Warning Phase: Alerts the driver via dashboard lights, sounds, or steering wheel vibrations (e.g., 1–2 seconds before collision).
- Braking Phase: Applies partial braking to slow the vehicle or full braking to stop if the driver does not respond.
- Emergency Steering (Optional): Some systems suggest or execute evasive steering to avoid pedestrians if braking alone is insufficient.
4. Scenarios Addressed:
- Pedestrian crossing the road (e.g., at a crosswalk or unexpectedly).
- Pedestrian walking along the road (e.g., on a shoulder or sidewalk).
- Child darting into the street.
- Nighttime or low-visibility conditions (e.g., using infrared or enhanced cameras).
Pedestrian AEB in Euro NCAP Testing
Euro NCAP includes pedestrian AEB as a critical part of its Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Protection category, which contributes 20% to the overall 1-to-5-star rating. Since 2016, pedestrian AEB testing has been a core component, reflecting its importance in urban safety. Below are the key aspects of Euro NCAP’s pedestrian AEB testing (based on 2025 protocols):
1. Test Scenarios
- Pedestrian Crossing (Car-to-Pedestrian Crossing, CPNC):
- Adult or child pedestrian crosses the road perpendicular to the vehicle’s path.
- Speeds: 10–60 km/h (6–37 mph).
- Variations: Daytime, nighttime, and obscured pedestrian (e.g., emerging from behind a parked car).
- Pedestrian Alongside (Car-to-Pedestrian Nearside, CPNA):
- Pedestrian walks parallel to the vehicle (e.g., on a sidewalk or road edge).
- Speeds: 10–40 km/h.
- Turning Scenarios (Car-to-Pedestrian Turning, CPNT):
- Vehicle turns at an intersection, with a pedestrian crossing or standing in the path.
- Speeds: 10–30 km/h.
- Nighttime Scenarios:
- Tests pedestrian detection in low-light conditions using headlights and sensors.
- Speeds: 20–60 km/h.
2. Test Setup
- Dummies: Uses articulated pedestrian dummies (adult and child sizes) with realistic movement to simulate walking or running.
- Sensors Tested: Evaluates camera, radar, and lidar performance in detecting pedestrians.
- Conditions: Tests in daylight, dusk, nighttime, and adverse weather (e.g., rain simulation) to assess robustness.
3. Scoring
- Criteria:
- Full Avoidance: Maximum points if the vehicle stops before hitting the pedestrian.
- Speed Reduction: Partial points if the vehicle slows significantly (e.g., reducing impact speed to <20 km/h, where injury risk is low).
- Warning Effectiveness: Points for timely driver alerts.
- Points: Up to 18 points for pedestrian AEB (out of 54 for VRU Protection, with 36 for passive protection and 18 for cyclist AEB).
- Example: A vehicle that stops for a crossing pedestrian at 40 km/h in daytime and nighttime scores high (e.g., 16/18 points).
4. Impact on Rating
- A strong pedestrian AEB score (~80%+ in VRU Protection) is critical for a 5-star Euro NCAP rating, as it requires balanced performance across all categories (AOP, COP, VRU, Safety Assist).
- Weak AEB performance (e.g., failure to detect pedestrians at night) can cap the overall rating at 3 or 4 stars.
Pedestrian AEB in US NCAP
The US NCAP (NHTSA’s 5-Star Safety Rating Program) has historically focused on crashworthiness (frontal, side, rollover) but is expanding to include pedestrian AEB, reflecting rising U.S. pedestrian fatalities (7,342 in 2022, up 57% since 2013). Below are details of US NCAP’s approach to pedestrian AEB (based on proposed changes as of 2025):
1. Proposed Test Scenarios (2022 Proposal)
- Pedestrian Crossing:
- Adult or child pedestrian crossing the road (straight or diagonal).
- Speeds: 10–40 mph (16–64 km/h).
- Day and night conditions.
- Pedestrian Alongside:
- Pedestrian walking parallel to the vehicle.
- Speeds: 10–25 mph.
- Turning Scenarios:
- Vehicle turning at intersections with a pedestrian in the path.
- Speeds: 10–20 mph.
- Note: Nighttime testing is proposed but less comprehensive than Euro NCAP’s.
2. Test Setup
- Dummies: Uses articulated pedestrian dummies (adult and child).
- Sensors Tested: Focuses on camera and radar systems, as lidar is less common in U.S. vehicles.
- Conditions: Primarily daytime, with limited nighttime and adverse weather tests compared to Euro NCAP.
3. Scoring
- Criteria: Points for full avoidance, speed reduction, or effective warnings.
- Integration: Pedestrian AEB will contribute to an updated US NCAP rating system (details pending), likely as part of a new ADAS category rather than a standalone VRU score.
- Example: A vehicle stopping for a crossing pedestrian at 25 mph would score well, but the lack of passive protection tests limits overall VRU focus.
4. Impact on Rating
- Once implemented (targeted for 2026–2029), pedestrian AEB scores will influence the overall 5-star rating, but the weighting is unclear.
- Unlike Euro NCAP, US NCAP does not yet have a dedicated VRU category, so pedestrian AEB’s impact is less pronounced.
Comparison of Pedestrian AEB in Euro NCAP vs. US NCAP
Key Differences:
- Scope: Euro NCAP’s pedestrian AEB testing is more comprehensive, covering nighttime, adverse weather, and a wider range of scenarios, integrated with passive protection tests. US NCAP’s proposed tests are narrower, focusing only on AEB.
- Maturity: Euro NCAP has a decade of pedestrian AEB testing, while US NCAP is still developing its protocols.
- Impact on Ratings: Euro NCAP’s VRU category (20%) gives pedestrian AEB significant weight, while US NCAP’s approach is less defined and not yet a standalone category.
- Regulatory Context: Euro NCAP aligns with mandatory ECE R127 and EU General Safety Regulation (2019/2144), while US NCAP’s proposed tests precede a potential FMVSS No. 127 mandate.
Mandatory Standards for Pedestrian AEB
- European Union: ECE Regulation No. 127 and General Safety Regulation (2019/2144):
- Since: 2022 (AEB mandatory for new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles).
- Requirements:
- AEB must detect pedestrians and apply brakes to avoid or mitigate collisions.
- Passive protection (hood, bumper) must minimize head and leg injuries (HIC <1,000, leg forces <6 kN).
- Applies to speeds up to 60 km/h.
- Testing: Less stringent than Euro NCAP, with fewer scenarios (e.g., no mandatory nighttime tests).
- United States:
- No Mandatory Standard: As of July 2025, no FMVSS requires pedestrian AEB.
- Proposed FMVSS No. 127: NHTSA proposed mandating pedestrian AEB by 2029, with tests similar to US NCAP’s proposed scenarios (up to 40 mph, day/night).
- Global: UNECE’s Global Technical Regulation (GTR) No. 9 harmonizes passive pedestrian protection but does not yet mandate AEB. Countries like Japan, China (GB/T 24550), and Australia align with EU standards.
Euro NCAP’s pedestrian AEB tests exceed ECE R127 by including cyclist AEB, nighttime scenarios, and stricter performance criteria, while US NCAP’s proposed tests aim to catch up but lack passive protection requirements.
Integration with TPMS
Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS), mandated by ECE Regulation No. 64 in the EU and FMVSS No. 138 in the U.S., support pedestrian AEB by ensuring optimal tire performance, which is critical for braking and stability:
- Euro NCAP:
- Role: TPMS detects a 25% tire pressure loss within 10–60 minutes, ensuring proper tire grip for AEB to stop or slow the vehicle effectively in pedestrian scenarios.
- Impact: Underinflated tires increase stopping distances (e.g., by 10–20% at 40 km/h), reducing AEB effectiveness and lowering VRU scores (18/54 points).
- Synergy: TPMS enhances Safety Assist (20% of rating), where pedestrian AEB is scored, by supporting AEB, ESC, and lane-keeping performance.
- US NCAP:
- Role: TPMS ensures tire pressure for proposed pedestrian AEB tests, where braking efficiency is critical.
- Impact: Proper tire pressure minimizes stopping distances, supporting AEB’s ability to avoid pedestrian collisions in future tests.
- Synergy: TPMS supports crashworthiness (frontal, side, rollover) and proposed ADAS tests by maintaining vehicle control.
- Comparison:
- Euro NCAP’s explicit inclusion of pedestrian AEB in VRU and Safety Assist categories makes TPMS’s role more direct, as tire performance impacts scored scenarios.
- US NCAP’s emerging AEB tests rely on TPMS for braking efficiency, but its impact is less defined due to the lack of a VRU category.
Impact of Pedestrian AEB
1. Reduced Pedestrian Fatalities and Injuries:
- Euro NCAP’s pedestrian AEB testing has driven adoption of AEB systems, reducing pedestrian deaths by ~20% in Europe since 2016 (per EU road safety data).
- US pedestrian fatalities (7,342 in 2022) could decrease with AEB adoption, with NHTSA estimating a 5–10% reduction if mandated by 2029.
2. Vehicle Design Improvements:
- Manufacturers integrate advanced sensors (e.g., radar, lidar) and algorithms to achieve high Euro NCAP VRU scores.
- US NCAP’s proposed AEB tests will encourage similar adoption, though passive protection (e.g., hood design) lags.
3. Consumer Awareness:
- Euro NCAP’s VRU scores (www.euroncap.com) highlight pedestrian AEB performance, guiding buyers to safer vehicles.
- US NCAP’s future ratings will include AEB performance on Monroney stickers, increasing transparency.
4. Global Influence:
- Euro NCAP’s pedestrian AEB protocols are adopted by Australasian NCAP, Latin NCAP, and Bharat NCAP, influencing global standards like GTR No. 9.
- US NCAP’s proposed tests align with global trends but have less international impact.
Challenges and Criticisms
- Euro NCAP:
- Cost: Pedestrian AEB systems (e.g., radar, cameras) increase vehicle prices, challenging budget models.
- False Positives: Over-sensitive AEB can brake unnecessarily, frustrating drivers.
- Nighttime Limitations: Some systems struggle in low-light conditions, though Euro NCAP’s tests are pushing improvements.
- US NCAP:
- Delayed Adoption: Lack of pedestrian AEB testing until 2026–2029 lags behind Euro NCAP.
- Limited Scope: Proposed tests exclude passive protection and cyclist AEB, unlike Euro NCAP.
- Regulatory Lag: No mandatory AEB standard delays widespread adoption compared to the EU.
Future of Pedestrian AEB
- Euro NCAP:
- Expanding nighttime and adverse weather AEB tests.
- Including micromobility (e.g., e-scooters, skateboards) in VRU scenarios.
- Integrating AEB with autonomous vehicle systems for enhanced detection.
- US NCAP:
- Implementing pedestrian AEB tests by 2026–2029, with potential expansion to cyclist detection.
- Aligning with proposed FMVSS No. 127 for mandatory AEB.
- Global Trends:
- Harmonization via UNECE GTRs to mandate pedestrian AEB globally.
- Advances in sensor fusion (camera + radar + lidar) and AI for better detection accuracy.
Conclusion
Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) is a critical safety technology that detects and avoids collisions with pedestrians, significantly reducing fatalities and injuries.
Euro NCAP leads with comprehensive pedestrian AEB testing within its VRU Protection category (20% of its 5-star rating), covering diverse scenarios (day, night, crossing, turning) and exceeding ECE R127 standards.
US NCAP is catching up with proposed AEB tests (targeted for 2026–2029) but lacks passive protection testing and a dedicated VRU category.
TPMS supports both programs by ensuring tire performance for effective braking, with a more direct impact in Euro NCAP’s Safety Assist scores. Euro NCAP’s mature approach drives global AEB adoption, while US NCAP’s emerging tests aim to address rising U.S. pedestrian fatalities. For specific vehicle AEB ratings, check www.euroncap.com or www.nhtsa.gov/ratings.
0 Comments