The Euro NCAP (European New Car Assessment Programme) and US NCAP (United States New Car Assessment Program), administered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), are both independent vehicle safety rating programs designed to evaluate and communicate the safety performance of new vehicles to consumers.
While they share the goal of improving vehicle safety through standardized testing and star ratings, they differ significantly in their testing methodologies, scope, criteria, and influence.
This comparison focuses on their approaches to Child Occupant Protection (COP), crashworthiness, integration with systems like Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS), and broader safety assessments, drawing on their respective protocols and global impact.
Overview of Euro NCAP and US NCAP
Euro NCAP
- Established: 1997 by the Transport Research Laboratory (UK), backed by European governments, motoring organizations, and the European Union.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_NCAP)
- Purpose: Provides consumer-focused safety ratings to encourage manufacturers to exceed mandatory EU standards (e.g., ECE Regulations) and promote advanced safety technologies.
- Scope: Tests passenger cars, light commercial vehicles, and some heavy vehicles, focusing on Adult Occupant Protection (AOP), Child Occupant Protection (COP), Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Protection, and Safety Assist.
- Rating System: 1-to-5-star ratings, with detailed percentage scores for four categories. Ratings expire after six years due to evolving protocols.[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/about-euro-ncap/how-to-read-the-stars/)[](https://www.carwow.co.uk/guides/choosing/euro-ncap-scores-explained)
- Voluntary: Not mandatory, but widely adopted due to market influence and consumer demand.
- Location: Based in Brussels, Belgium, with testing at certified facilities (e.g., TRL, ADAC).
US NCAP
- Established: 1979 by the NHTSA, following the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of 1972.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
- Purpose: Evaluates vehicle safety to inform consumers and encourage manufacturers to meet or exceed Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS).
- Scope: Primarily tests passenger cars, light trucks, and SUVs, focusing on frontal crash, side crash, and rollover resistance. Recent proposals include advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and pedestrian protection.
- Rating System: 1-to-5-star ratings for frontal crash, side crash, and rollover, with an overall rating. Ratings do not expire but are updated with new tests.
- Voluntary: Not mandatory, but manufacturers must display ratings on the Monroney sticker (vehicle price sticker) since 2007.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
- Location: Administered by NHTSA, with testing at U.S. facilities.
Key Differences in Testing and Rating
1. Testing Scope and Categories
Euro NCAP:
- Comprehensive Scope: Assesses four categories: AOP (40%), COP (20%), VRU Protection (20%), and Safety Assist (20%), covering both passive (crashworthiness) and active (crash avoidance) safety.[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/ratings-rewards/latest-safety-ratings)
- Tests:
- Frontal: Full-Width Rigid Barrier (50 km/h), Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier (MPDB, 50 km/h).
- Side: Mobile Deformable Barrier (60 km/h), Pole Test (32 km/h), Far-Side Impact.
- Rear: Whiplash test (16–24 km/h).
- VRU: Pedestrian and cyclist head, leg, and pelvis impact tests; AEB for VRU.
- Safety Assist: AEB (car-to-car, pedestrian, cyclist), lane support, speed assistance, driver monitoring.
- Focus: Broad, including pedestrian/cyclist safety and advanced technologies, with evolving protocols (updated every 2–3 years).[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/about-euro-ncap/how-to-read-the-stars/)
- Child Occupant Protection (COP):
- Tests Q6 (6-year-old) and Q10 (10-year-old) dummies in frontal (50 km/h) and side (60 km/h) crashes.
- Evaluates CRS installation (ISOFIX, seat belt) and vehicle features (e.g., airbag deactivation).
- Scores dynamic performance (24 points), CRS installation (12 points), and vehicle features (13 points).[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/ratings-rewards/safest-family-cars/)
US NCAP:
- Narrower Scope: Focuses on frontal crash, side crash, and rollover resistance, with recent proposals (2022) to include ADAS (e.g., AEB, lane departure warning) and pedestrian protection.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
- Tests:
- Frontal: 35 mph (56 km/h) crash into a rigid barrier.
- Side: Mobile Deformable Barrier (38.5 mph, 62 km/h), Pole Test (20 mph, 32 km/h).
- Rollover: Static Stability Factor (SSF) and dynamic rollover tests.
- Proposed (2022): AEB for pedestrians, blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping assist.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
- Focus: Emphasizes crashworthiness (passive safety), with less attention to active safety and pedestrian protection compared to Euro NCAP.
- Child Occupant Protection (COP):
- Tests child dummies (e.g., 3-year-old, 6-year-old) in frontal (35 mph) and side (38.5 mph) crashes, per FMVSS No. 213.
- Evaluates LATCH system compatibility but does not score CRS installation ease or vehicle features as extensively as Euro NCAP.
- COP is integrated into the frontal and side crash ratings, not a separate category.
Comparison:
- Euro NCAP’s broader scope includes pedestrian/cyclist protection and active safety systems, making it more comprehensive. US NCAP’s focus on crashworthiness is narrower but aligns with mandatory FMVSS standards.
- Euro NCAP’s dedicated COP category provides detailed child safety insights, while US NCAP integrates COP into overall crash ratings, offering less granularity.
2. Child Occupant Protection (COP)
Euro NCAP:
- Testing: Uses Q6 and Q10 dummies in frontal (50 km/h MPDB) and side (60 km/h) crashes, testing approved CRS (i-Size or ECE R44).
- Criteria: Measures Head Injury Criterion (HIC, <1,000), chest acceleration (<55g), neck forces, and head excursion. Assesses ISOFIX compatibility, airbag deactivation, and labeling.
- Scoring: 20% of the overall rating, with up to 49 points (24 for dynamic tests, 12 for CRS installation, 13 for vehicle features). High scores require robust CRS performance and user-friendly features.[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/ratings-rewards/safest-family-cars/)
- Standards: Exceeds ECE R44 and R129 (i-Size), which mandate rear-facing seats up to 15 months and side-impact testing.
- Example: A vehicle with universal ISOFIX, effective CRS, and airbag deactivation scores high (e.g., 90%+ for COP).
US NCAP:
- Testing: Uses child dummies (e.g., Hybrid III 3-year-old, 6-year-old) in frontal (35 mph) and side (38.5 mph) crashes, per FMVSS No. 213.
- Criteria: Measures HIC (<1,000), chest acceleration (<60g), and head excursion (<32 inches). Evaluates LATCH anchor performance but not installation ease as extensively.
- Scoring: COP is not a separate category; child dummy performance contributes to frontal and side crash ratings (1–5 stars).
- Standards: Aligns with FMVSS No. 213 (CRS performance) and No. 225 (LATCH), which require two LATCH positions and three top tethers.
- Example: A vehicle with strong LATCH anchors and good dummy performance in frontal crashes contributes to a high overall rating but lacks specific COP focus.
Comparison:
- Depth: Euro NCAP’s COP testing is more detailed, with a dedicated category, specific scores, and evaluations of CRS installation and vehicle features. US NCAP integrates COP into broader crash tests, providing less specific child safety data.
- Test Severity: Euro NCAP’s side impact test (60 km/h) is more stringent than US NCAP’s (38.5 mph), but US NCAP’s frontal test (35 mph rigid barrier) is slightly different in impact dynamics compared to Euro NCAP’s MPDB (50 km/h).
- Focus: Euro NCAP emphasizes user-friendliness (e.g., ISOFIX ease) and modern CRS standards (i-Size), while US NCAP focuses on crash performance and LATCH compliance.
3. Crashworthiness Standards
Euro NCAP:
- Tests: Includes frontal (Full-Width, MPDB), side (Barrier, Pole, Far-Side), and rear (whiplash) tests, assessing structural integrity, restraint systems, and injury criteria (e.g., HIC, chest deflection).[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/ratings-rewards/latest-safety-ratings)
- Standards: Exceeds ECE Regulations (e.g., No. 94 for frontal, No. 95 for side), with higher speeds (e.g., 60 km/h side vs. 50 km/h in ECE) and stricter injury limits.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_NCAP)
- Focus: Comprehensive crashworthiness, including far-side impact and whiplash, not covered by EU regulations.
- Scoring: AOP (40%) and COP (20%) heavily emphasize crashworthiness, requiring robust safety cages, airbags, and seat belts.
US NCAP:
- Tests: Frontal (35 mph rigid barrier), side (38.5 mph barrier, 20 mph pole), and rollover (static and dynamic tests).[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
- Standards: Aligns with FMVSS No. 208 (frontal), No. 214 (side), and No. 216 (roof crush), meeting mandatory requirements but not exceeding them as significantly as Euro NCAP.
- Focus: Emphasizes structural integrity and restraint performance in frontal and side crashes, with rollover as a unique component.
- Scoring: Separate star ratings for frontal, side, and rollover, with an overall rating combining these.
Comparison:
- Test Variety: Euro NCAP includes more crash scenarios (e.g., MPDB, far-side, whiplash) than US NCAP, which focuses on frontal, side, and rollover.
- Stringency: Euro NCAP’s tests are generally stricter (e.g., 60 km/h side impact vs. 38.5 mph in US NCAP), exceeding mandatory standards by a wider margin.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_NCAP)
- Focus: Euro NCAP balances crashworthiness with active safety, while US NCAP prioritizes crashworthiness but is expanding to ADAS.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
4. Integration with TPMS
Euro NCAP:
- Role: TPMS, mandated by ECE Regulation No. 64, ensures proper tire pressure, enhancing vehicle stability and crash avoidance (e.g., AEB, ESC performance in Safety Assist).[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/ratings-rewards/safest-family-cars/)
- Impact: Proper tire pressure supports COP by maintaining stability in crash tests, ensuring CRS and vehicle structures perform as intended. Underinflated tires could increase head excursion or crash severity.
- Scoring: TPMS indirectly boosts Safety Assist scores (20% of rating) by enabling effective ADAS performance, which assumes compliant tire pressure.
US NCAP:
- Role: TPMS, mandated by FMVSS No. 138 since 2007, ensures tire pressure monitoring to reduce blowout and rollover risks, critical for US NCAP’s rollover tests.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
- Impact: Supports crashworthiness by maintaining stability in frontal and side crash tests, benefiting child dummy performance. Proposed ADAS tests (e.g., AEB) will rely on TPMS for optimal braking.
- Scoring: TPMS indirectly supports frontal, side, and rollover ratings by ensuring tire performance, but it’s not explicitly scored.
Comparison:
- Both programs rely on TPMS to ensure vehicle stability, but Euro NCAP’s broader Safety Assist category gives TPMS a more explicit role in active safety scoring.
- US NCAP’s focus on rollover tests highlights TPMS’s importance in preventing rollovers, which can affect child safety in crashes.
5. Scoring and Rating System
Euro NCAP:
- Structure: Percentage scores for AOP (40%), COP (20%), VRU (20%), and Safety Assist (20%), converted to a 1–5-star overall rating.[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/about-euro-ncap/how-to-read-the-stars/)
- Criteria: Requires balanced performance across all categories for high stars. A weak score in any area (e.g., COP) can limit the overall rating.
- Dual Ratings: Since 2016, some vehicles receive dual ratings (standard vs. optional safety pack).[](https://www.carbuyer.co.uk/car-safety/112490/euro-ncap-how-safe-is-my-car)
- Expiration: Ratings expire after six years due to protocol updates, ensuring relevance.[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/about-euro-ncap/how-to-read-the-stars/)
- Example: A 5-star vehicle needs ~80%+ in AOP, COP, VRU, and Safety Assist, with advanced features like AEB and lane support.
US NCAP:
- Structure: Separate star ratings (1–5) for frontal crash, side crash, and rollover, with an overall rating combining these.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
- Criteria: Focuses on crashworthiness performance (e.g., injury metrics like HIC, chest deflection). Proposed ADAS tests will add new criteria.
- No Expiration: Ratings remain valid unless retested, but new protocols may render older ratings less comparable.
- Example: A 5-star vehicle excels in frontal (HIC <700), side (low injury risk), and rollover (high SSF) tests.
Comparison:
- Euro NCAP’s weighted scoring across four categories is more holistic, emphasizing both passive and active safety. US NCAP’s separate ratings for crash types are simpler but less comprehensive.
- Euro NCAP’s expiration policy ensures ratings reflect current standards, while US NCAP’s persistent ratings may become outdated.[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/about-euro-ncap/how-to-read-the-stars/)
6. Regulatory Context
Euro NCAP:
- Voluntary: Exceeds mandatory ECE Regulations (e.g., No. 94, 95, 127, 129) and EU General Safety Regulation (2019/2144).[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_NCAP)
- Influence: Drives EU regulations (e.g., mandating AEB, ISA) by demonstrating safety benefits.[](https://www.carbuyer.co.uk/car-safety/112490/euro-ncap-how-safe-is-my-car)
- Example: Euro NCAP’s stricter side impact (60 km/h vs. 50 km/h in ECE R95) pushes manufacturers to enhance crashworthiness.
US NCAP:
- Voluntary: Complements mandatory FMVSS standards (e.g., No. 208, 214, 213, 225).[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
- Influence: Influences FMVSS updates (e.g., proposed AEB mandate by 2029) but is less aggressive in pushing beyond legal requirements.
- Example: Aligns with FMVSS No. 213 for CRS but does not test installation ease as Euro NCAP does.
Comparison:
- Euro NCAP exceeds EU standards by a wider margin, driving innovation (e.g., pedestrian AEB). US NCAP aligns closely with FMVSS, with recent efforts to incorporate ADAS.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
7. Global Influence and Consumer Impact
Euro NCAP:
- Global Reach: Protocols adopted by Australasian NCAP, Latin NCAP, ASEAN NCAP, and Bharat NCAP. Influences UNECE Global Technical Regulations (e.g., GTR No. 9).[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_NCAP)
- Consumer Impact: High ratings boost sales; low ratings (e.g., Fiat Punto’s 0 stars in 2017) can lead to market withdrawal.[](https://www.carwow.co.uk/guides/choosing/euro-ncap-scores-explained)
- Example: The Rover 100’s 1-star rating in 1997 led to its discontinuation.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_NCAP)
US NCAP:
- Global Reach: Influences North American markets and some global standards but less widespread than Euro NCAP.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
- Consumer Impact: Monroney sticker ratings guide U.S. buyers, with 5-star ratings enhancing marketability.
- Example: High US NCAP ratings for SUVs like the Toyota RAV4 drive consumer preference.
Comparison:
- Euro NCAP has greater global influence due to its adoption by other NCAP programs and alignment with UNECE. US NCAP’s impact is stronger in North America but less global.
- Both programs significantly influence consumer behavior, but Euro NCAP’s detailed reports and broader scope provide more transparency.
8. Criticisms and Challenges
Euro NCAP:
- Cost: High ratings require expensive technologies (e.g., AEB, ISOFIX), increasing vehicle prices.[](https://www.carbuyer.co.uk/car-safety/112490/euro-ncap-how-safe-is-my-car)
- Protocol Updates: Frequent changes (every 2–3 years) challenge manufacturers, especially smaller ones.[](https://www.euroncap.com/en/about-euro-ncap/how-to-read-the-stars/)
- Variant Bias: Tests often focus on higher-end trims, not reflecting base model safety.[](https://www.carbuyer.co.uk/car-safety/112490/euro-ncap-how-safe-is-my-car)
US NCAP:
- Limited Scope: Criticized for not including ADAS and pedestrian protection until recently, lagging behind Euro NCAP.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Car_Assessment_Program)
- Outdated Ratings: Lack of expiration means older ratings may not reflect current standards.
- Less Granularity: No separate COP category reduces focus on child safety specifics.
Comparison:
- Euro NCAP’s frequent updates keep it cutting-edge but demanding, while US NCAP’s slower evolution ensures consistency but risks obsolescence.
- Euro NCAP’s broader scope addresses modern safety concerns more effectively, but US NCAP’s simpler approach is easier for consumers to understand.
Conclusion
Euro NCAP and US NCAP both aim to enhance vehicle safety through consumer-focused ratings, but they differ significantly:
- Scope: Euro NCAP is more comprehensive, covering AOP, COP, VRU, and Safety Assist, while US NCAP focuses on frontal, side, and rollover crashworthiness, with emerging ADAS tests.
- Child Occupant Protection: Euro NCAP’s dedicated COP category (20% of rating) provides detailed child safety insights, testing CRS installation and vehicle features, while US NCAP integrates COP into crash ratings, offering less specificity.
- Crashworthiness: Euro NCAP’s tests (e.g., 60 km/h side impact, MPDB) are stricter and more varied than US NCAP’s (e.g., 38.5 mph side impact), exceeding mandatory standards by a wider margin.
- TPMS: Both rely on TPMS (ECE R64 for Euro NCAP, FMVSS No. 138 for US NCAP) to ensure stability, but Euro NCAP ties it to Safety Assist scores, while US NCAP links it to rollover and crash performance.
- Influence: Euro NCAP has greater global impact and drives innovation, while US NCAP is influential in North America but slower to adopt active safety.
For consumers prioritizing child safety, Euro NCAP’s detailed COP scores and focus on CRS usability make it more informative. For crashworthiness, Euro NCAP’s broader and stricter tests provide a higher benchmark, while US NCAP’s focus on core crash types is robust but less comprehensive. Both programs benefit from TPMS, ensuring vehicle stability critical for crash avoidance and child protection.
To compare specific vehicle ratings, check www.euroncap.com or www.nhtsa.gov/ratings. If you need ratings for a particular model or real-time insights let me know!
0 Comments